Skip to main content

Your data has issues

There is a problem

  • 2 entries must have valid integers
Reference Name Site address Deliverable Hazardous substances Hectares MinNetDwellings Minimum net dwellings Maximum net dwellings Ownership status Planning permission date Planning permission type Planning permission history Planning permission status Site plan URL Point Notes OrganisationLabel Organisation Entry date Start date End date
RBG-44 RBG-44 “Knight Dragon site, Edmund Halley Way Greenwich“ yes 46.11 5000

6000

Invalid integer

mixed-ownership 2015-12-08 outline-planning-permission https://www.royalgreenwich.gov.uk/info/200193/planning_applications_and_permissions/21/view_planning_applications_decisions_and_appeals permissioned POINT(0.005182 51.49826) “15/0716/O. Anticipated that between 5000 to 10,000 dwellings will be completed within a 15-year timeframe up to 2034. 2019-12-17 2017-12-22
RBG-55 RBG-55 “Plots N0205, N0206 & N0207, Peninsula Square, West Parkside Greenwich “ yes 1.63

1007

Invalid integer

not-owned-by-a-public-authority 2016-05-31 other https://www.royalgreenwich.gov.uk/info/200193/planning_applications_and_permissions/21/view_planning_applications_decisions_and_appeals permissioned POINT(0.008321 51.501155) 16/0186/MA. Started. 2019-12-17 2017-12-22

How to fix this issue

Your dataset is missing the NetDwellingsRangeTo column.

The Brownfield land guidance explains how to fix the issue:

NetDwellingsRangeTo

Enter the maximum number of dwellings that the local planning authority estimates the site should support, as defined in regulation 2 of the 2017 Regulations.

How to improve Royal Borough of Greenwich’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL